That one was not the Light, but - that he might testify about the Light.Įllicott's Commentary for English Readers(8) He was not that Light, but was sent.-It is necessary to repeat the statement of John's position and work in an emphatic form. He was not the Light, but he existed that he might give testimony concerning the Light. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear testimony of that Light. He was not the light, but was sent that he might testify about the light. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify to the light. He himself was not the light, but he came to testify about the light. He was not the light, but came to testify to the light. That one was not the Light, but-that he might testify about the Light. John was not the light, but he came to testify about the light. He himself was not the light he came to tell about the light.
John was not the light, but he came to declare the truth about the light. He was not the light, but was to give testimony of the light. He was not The Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. He was not the light, but he came to testify about the light. John was not the Light, but came to testify about the Light. He was not the Light, but he came to bear witness about the Light. He was not the light, but came that he might bear witness of the light. He was not the Light, but he came to testify about the Light. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light. He was not the Light, but came that he might witness concerning the Light. He himself was not the Light, but he came to testify about the Light. He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the light. John himself was not the light he was simply a witness to tell about the light. He himself was not the light he came only as a witness to the light.
0 kommentar(er)
